Search This Blog

Friday, August 19, 2011

Israel Knew Attack was Coming, Expected Kidnapping Attempt

author Friday August 19, 2011 07:46author by Saed Bannoura - IMEMC & Agencies Report post
An initial investigation carried out by the Israeli army on the armed attack that targeting a bus loaded with Israeli soldiers, close to the border with Egypt, in the Israeli coastal city of Eilat, revealed that information regarding an attack was available before it took place, but pointed out a possible kidnapping attempt, not a shooting. Seven Palestinians, including children, and seven Egyptian officers were killed by Israeli bombardment.
The army stated that it found it difficult to deal with the information due to the large number of similar warnings, and that the military leadership estimated that the potential time for this attack would be at night, not in broad daylight.

The investigation also revealed that the attackers infiltrated into Israel through an area near an Egyptian military base, an unlikely location to infiltrate into Israel.

Israeli daily, Haaretz, reported that this attack was planned by the Popular Resistance Committee in the Gaza Strip, and that the fighters managed to infiltrate from the Gaza Strip into the Sinai desert through tunnels, before they travelled nearly 200 kilometers to an area that is only protected with tattered wire fence, 15 kilometers north of Eilat. They then opened fire at a bus carrying Israeli soldiers north of Netafim Crossing.

Haaretz further stated that the soldiers managed to kill five of the fighters while the Egyptian Security Forces killed two others. Israel believes that at least 15-20
fighters participated in the attack, and that most of them managed to escape.

According to Haaretz, the driver of the bus said that the attackers were dressed in Egyptian military uniforms, and that he thought that they were just repairing the border fence.

Haaretz added that the attack was initiated at noon on Thursday, and that approximately 15 gunmen, armed with rifles, grenades and explosives, infiltrated into Israel from Egypt and stationed themselves 200 meters away from each other at the Eilat Highway, Route 12, close to the border.

They then opened fire at the bus around 12:30 afternoon, wounding seven passengers. Minutes later, an empty bus and several cars arrived at the scene, and came under fire from the fighters while one of the gunmen ran towards the bus before activating his explosive belt killing himself and the bus driver.

The gunmen reportedly infiltrated into Sinai through a tunnel before they headed to an area that is 200 kilometers away, that is only protected by a tattered wire-fence, just 15 kilometers north of Eilat.

The Israel army shot and killed five gunmen while Egypt reported that its border police shot and killed two others. The rest apparently managed to escape unharmed.

Israel said that one of the fighters even fired an RPG (Rocket Propelled Grenades) at a military helicopter that arrived at the scene, but missed it.

Following the attack, Israel carried out several air strikes targeting a number of areas in different parts of the Gaza Strip killing seven Palestinians, including a 2 year old child and a teenager, aged 13. At least 19 residents, including children, were injured.

It is worth mentioning that Cairo stated that seven Egyptian officers were killed by Israeli military fire, targeting them in Sinai, while several others were injured.
Following the attack, a senior Egyptian military officer headed to Sinai along with several soldiers of the special brigades to assess the situation, especially since the Egyptian soldiers were in Egyptian territory close to the border and did not infiltrate into Israel.

Egypt says that an Israeli military helicopter chased the fighters in Egyptian territory and opened fire at them wounding Egyptian military personnel.

A massive protest is planned in front of the Israeli embassy in Cairo on Friday where hundreds are expected to attend.

Lieutenant Al-Sayyed Abdul-Wahab Mabrook, north Sinai Governor, denied the Israeli claims regarding Palestinian fighters infiltrating into Egypt through the border before they headed to Eilat, and stated that these claims are impossible to believe, as he said Egypt has a firm grip on the border through traps and extensive military deployment.

Mabrook, who headed the Egyptian Border Police until he became the governor of North Sinai, stated that Egypt has full control over the border with Gaza, and that the extensive security presence was not affected by the regime change in Egypt.

He also stated that the border from Rafah in the north to Taba in the south is very long, and that Egypt’s security presence there prevents any suspects from infiltrating through the area. 

http://www.imemc.org/article/61855

Car torched in Ramallah village


Published yesterday 22:31
 
 
 
RAMALLAH (Ma'an) -- Dura Al-Qara residents on Friday accused settlers of setting fire to a car in the village overnight.

Locals said anti-Arab slogans were written in Hebrew near the burnt out vehicle, adding that residents of Beit Eil settlement often clashed with Palestinians in the village east of Ramallah.

The owner of the vehicle, Abdul Ghani Yassin, filed a report on the incident with the Israeli military but villagers said they doubted the army would investigate the case.

http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=414474

Does AIPAC Have Only Two Major Donors?

by Guest Post on August 16, 2011
By Grant Smith * | Sabbah Report | www.sabbah.biz


John Boehner and Eric Cantor

A large congressional delegation is heading for Israel. During three weeks of recess, 55 Republicans and 26 Democrats will enjoy "educational" trips funded by the American Israel Education Foundation, a tax-exempt nonprofit located in the same Washington, D.C., building as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Absent AIPAC's influence on pro-Israel campaign contributors, members of Congress would probably skip international travel this year to meet the pressing needs of their districts or to venture to places of actual importance to the U.S., such as Europe, China, or Latin America. Instead, because AIPAC is always watching members of Congress, our representatives go to Israel. But this raises an important question: Who is really behind AIPAC?

AIPAC's last IRS list of contributors claims the organization now has only two major donors [.pdf]. As a tax-exempt 501(c)(4) organization (a category intended for civic leagues, social welfare organizations, and local associations of employees) AIPAC files an IRS Form 990. AIPAC has long structured its fiscal year end in such a way that it languidly files 2-year-old data while other nonprofits are rushing to report their previous year. Therefore, the AIPAC Form 990 listed as "year 2010″ at Guidestar.org, the officially designated website to consult such data, is actually year 2009 data [.pdf]. It also lacks the most important data in Form 990 - donor contributions.

Unlike the far more numerous nonprofit 501(c)(3) organizations, which have to continually "means test" that they have a wide public funding base in order for contributor donations to be tax-deductible, contributions to 501(c)(4) organizations such as AIPAC (which actively lobbies Congress, the executive, and numerous government agencies) are not tax-deductible. There are no contribution limits to 501 (c)(4) nonprofit groups. Individuals, foreign nationals, partnerships, associations, and other organizations may contribute whatever amount they like to a 501(c)(4).

Given AIPAC's oversize clout in U.S. Middle East policy, it's always informative to see just how many people are giving - and how much. When AIPAC's founder, Isaiah Kenen, was dispatched in the early 1950s from his job at the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs with orders to lobby the U.S. Congress for guns and diplomatic support as an American (rather than the U.S. State Department as an Israeli foreign agent), it was supposed to be only a six-month gig. As that operation morphed into a semi-permanent Washington institution run outside the normal purview of the Foreign Agents Registration Act office, AIPAC was forced to tap a very small base of wealthy donors (some with criminal records) while simultaneously receiving covert support from the quasi-governmental Jewish Agency in Jerusalem.

After that "conduit" foreign- funding ruse was uncovered by a Justice Department investigation, Kenen emerged from the crisis and slowly built back up AIPAC's donor base, whipping up post-1967 Six-Day War donor fears and anxieties that Israel was in danger of being overrun (it wasn't) if people didn't send in their checks. Now, AIPAC is pushing largely the same "Israel in danger" emotional buttons, with Iran as the flashing red light.

AIPAC's schedule of donors doesn't appear on Guidestar. The IRS won't release it for any organization except by special request. Only then will the IRS send a "Schedule B" of contributors with all $5,000-plus contributors' names - but not their donations - censored. If the breadth of AIPAC's funding base is a "leading indicator" of AIPAC's popular support, it is America that should now be deeply worried that AIPAC is catering to drastically fewer - and possibly much more extreme - voices.
For fiscal year 2006, AIPAC's top contributor gave $650,000. The rest of AIPAC's "Schedule B" donors gave on average $16,772 each. The list of $5,000-plus donors numbered just over 1,700 individuals, so numerous that AIPAC had to attach a separate spreadsheet to its return [.pdf]. This large group of donors represented the majority (56 percent) of AIPAC's total claimed direct public support. If we assume AIPAC had approximately 50,000 paying members that year, the rest gave $464 each for a total of $50,920,792 in public support.

According to the special IRS release of AIPAC's 2009 Schedule B [.pdf] there were only two $5,000-plus donors. Donor number one gave $48,842,187. Donor number two chipped in $13,503,472. This means small donors contributed only $2,261,755 for total year 2009 public support of $64,607,414. The IRS confirms that there is no additional 2009 spreadsheet attachment of $5,000-plus donors as in 2006. AIPAC is now telling the IRS that it has only two meaningful donors.
There have been many reasons for smaller givers to bail out on AIPAC, leaving a pair of committed donors to carry all the weight. AIPAC, like any corporation, wants to chart a steadily increasing line of total revenues because any crisis-driven decline could weaken its brand and perceived power. But the years since 2006 have been rocky. Two former AIPAC officials narrowly escaped a long-awaited espionage prosecution, which was mysteriously tossed out by the Obama administration in 2009 after years of pre-trial escalation. Many AIPAC donors probably didn't have the stomach or risk-tolerance to donate to an organization that nurtured and then threw overboard top employees in order to save itself from an espionage indictment.

Ads
In 2009, former AIPAC official Steven J. Rosen noisily filed a $20 million defamation lawsuit against AIPAC and its board of directors. 2009 marked the year an ongoing campaign was launched to have AIPAC return to its roots by re-registering as an agent of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, rather than continue to operate as a domestic American lobby and "social welfare" organization. In 2010, AIPAC's tax exempt status was also challenged. These concerns could have been sufficient to drive away scores of AIPAC's key base of $5,000-plus donors. AIPAC's signature Washington gathering in May 2011 had a Potemkin village feel to it. Many attendees interviewed by Max Blumenthal seemed woefully uninformed about the issues. Many hundreds of others, including student leaders, attended only after receiving heavy travel subsidies.

If the threat of Rosen walking away with $20 million was enough to keep small donors at bay in the recent past, it will likely remain that way for a few more years. On June 20, 2011, Rosen filed a brief [.pdf] and a 629-page addendum in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Rosen explains why within the AIPAC corporate culture it was defamatory for his former employers to characterize his attempts to gather and use classified intelligence on Iran as not comporting with "standards that AIPAC expects of its employees." Rosen has even filed a "smoking gun" [.pdf] July 21, 2004, email updating AIPAC director Howard Kohr on U.S. intelligence obtained about Iran and details of Rosen's early use of classified U.S. secrets to derail Jesse Jackson's political career. Rosen's lawsuit will not only elevate insider concerns that AIPAC donor funds may soon be paid out as damage awards, but also raise the larger and more public governance questions about why AIPAC has never been indicted for espionage or theft of government property as a corporation, given what has now been so thoroughly documented in court.

As Americans nervously ponder their representatives' travel plans and AIPAC's nonstop lobbying for American economic and clandestine warfare on Israel's enemies, they must ask other serious questions. Who are the two people now providing the lion's share of AIPAC's funding? As long-time Washington Report on Middle East Affairs editor Janet McMahon revealed during the May 2011 Move Over AIPAC conference, it's not clear what percentage of AIPAC's donations come from American contributors and sources. Given AIPAC's influential leadership role at the head of a network of stealth political action committees it helped establish in the 1980s, will AIPAC's concentrated pool of core donors channel ever more extreme candidate guidance [.pdf] to the people who really count come election day, i.e., single-issue pro-Israel campaign contributors? What do the big AIPAC donors dispatching 20 percent of Congress to Israel think about trip-wiring the U.S. into an unwarranted military conflict with Iran? Americans should ask themselves whether any two people should have so much influence on U.S. Middle East policy.

* Grant F. Smith is the author of the Spy Trade: How Israel's Lobby Undermines America's Economy. He is a frequent contributor to Radio France Internationale and Voice of America's Foro Interamericano. Smith has also appeared on BBC News, CNN, and C-SPAN. He is currently director of the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy in Washington, D.C.

http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2011/08/16/aipac-two-donors/

Debate on Israeli crimes grow in West

Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:27PM GMT

Interview with Sarah Colborne, Director of Palestinian Solidarity Campaign




The debate over the Israeli occupation of Palestine is growing across Britain and some other Western countries. 
 
Moreover, some British officials are also divided on the official relationship with Israel. That is brought upon by a growing awareness among the general population of Israel’s brutality towards Palestine.

Press TV talks with Sarah Colborne, Director of Palestinian Solidarity Campaign in London in a discussion that centers on a book entitled ‘Gaza in Crisis’ written jointly by Professor’s Noam Chomsky and Israeli historian Ilan Pappe. Following is an approximate transcript of the interview.

Press TV: Reviewing the book by Noam Chomsky, ‘Gaza in Crisis’, what did you make of it and did you find it informative?

Sarah Colborne: It was very interesting and for me some of the most interesting material was the historic material around 2006-2007 because we tend to forget – we remember the major issues like Operation Cast Lead, but – we forget the build up to it and because the Israeli media have so much of a free reign you forget about facts.

For example, the same day that Shalit (Gilad Shalit, a French Israeli soldier taken by Hamas) was taken there were two Palestinian civilians kidnapped from Gaza and dragged into Israel, which was a far greater crime under international law and those sorts of detail you forget and so those details were very important for me to get out of this book.

Press TV: The Western news media doesn’t follow much of what happens in Palestine perhaps as so much is happening with other wars in the Middle East. You experienced this with the peace convoy in terms of how the media report things. It is difficult to get a balanced sense of reporting, isn’t it?

Sarah Colborne: Yes it is and there are stories in this book that are not widely known because of this, for example, why the Palestinian fishermen can’t fish further than three miles outside Gaza. And it links very clearly to the decision to reduce the space they have for fishing to the discovery of the oil field and Israel’s need to control those natural resources.

And so there are stories behind the immediate headlines and the problem is that we get immediate headlines like a few rockets coming from Gaza; what we don’t get – and that we get in this book – is that during the months prior to the taking of Gilad Shalit there were 7,700 rockets that had been fired from Israel into Gaza.

We often don’t get the entire story and this is why this book is very useful as we don’t normally get to read between the lines or behind history. Even people who are sympathetic to the Palestinians, you do need to understand what’s going on.

Press TV: The professors authors highlight in the book that it’s not just about the economic pressures, but it’s almost an attitude by Israel as well – that phrase of ‘exterminate the brutes’ which sort of jumps out at you from this book, this attitude that the Arabs in that part of the world are a lesser race, they’re not humans. And you’d think the Israelis of any race on the earth shouldn’t have that attitude; it’s horrifying when you see it expressed by very intelligent people…

Sarah Colborne: Absolutely, and this is becoming increasingly openly said with the drift even further to the right in Israeli society. But it is not something limited to the experience of Israel; this is something that has happened during all previous occupations.

For instance, the way that Britain always occupied countries to do it because they said the population were incapable of governing themselves – that’s always the arguments that’s used… and I think what is important to encourage now is the way that that lie is being completely exposed – with the Arab spring- because the populations of the region are rising up and declaring they want to have their right to determine their own society and their own futures and this is all impacting into the Palestinian struggle as well.

Press TV: There are certain views projected in the many who are pro-Israel and I find it slightly scary that this attitude decries international law completely about the effect on civilians. I mean, if there is somebody holding a gun OK it’s a fair target, but the vast areas of children and women and residential areas that have been attacked by Israeli forces and according to some with entire justification – it’s quite scary…

Sarah Colborne: It is scary, but I think also what is important in the book is the justification by Israeli military generals and politicians of the targeting of civilians and it explicitly says in the book that this is because you terrorize the civilian population into submission – that is the way that Israel believes it should handle the conflict rather than abiding by international law, ending the occupation, giving refugees the right of return and those sort of issues. And so the targeting and killing of civilians is not an accidental issue it’s a deliberate strategy.

But I think the future doesn’t need to be as bleak because although the situation on the ground in Palestine is horrific, there is far more awareness and far more activity to support the Palestinian cause and combined with the steadfastness of the Palestinians themselves, that is what gives me hope for the future.

Press TV: In this book the two professors don’t always agree – what’s your idea about the academic boycott?

Sarah Colborne: We are very clearly in support for the Palestinian boycott and divestment and sanctions and that includes academic boycott. And I think the tide is very clearly turning in favor of boycott. One of the issues that Chomsky raises in his book is he doesn’t believe there is support for it, but I think given what we have seen in support of boycott of Israeli goods and campaigns against complicit firms that are cooperating with Israel’s crimes… we’re seeing mass support for those campaigns now…

It’s a bit like in the situation of apartheid in South Africa, one of the key issues there was they took particular pride in their sporting prowess. With Israel, one of the key issues they take particular pride in is their academic prowess and so for them the academic boycott is a very key issue that they are campaigning against.

And I think it is obviously working when the Knesset are passing laws that ban Israelis from supporting a boycott. That is a bizarre attack on the freedom of speech and that reaction must indicate it is having some effect.

The point that Ilan Pappe makes at the end is that the movement for justice and for freedom for Palestinians is massively increasing worldwide, but the problem is that our governments do not reflect those views reasons and therefore the issue of what civil society can do by methods such as boycotting Israeli goods are very important and that’s the reason why the movement has grown so much because it is something everybody can do and they can act together to make a change.

Press TV: The UN can’t do anything because America will blocking everything so the UN is fairly toothless when it comes to the people in Palestine and Gaza…

Sarah Colborne: Yes it is. But I think there is also a discussion and debate happening not only in the US, but in Britain about whether it is in the US government’s or British government’s strategic interest to tie themselves so closely to Israel.

For example, you’ve had a number of reports from the British governments, from the Foreign Affairs committee and other bodies that really are questioning why Britain is not prepared to act in accordance with international law.

So I do think that the more pressure that we can put in civil society to change government’s policies, the more fertile ground we’ve got. And that’s the reason why by approaching each individual MP we have a great advantage here as we do have constituencies; we can elect or deselect our MP and bringing in the issue of Palestine as a key issue can make the big difference.

SC/JR

Click here to watch the video

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/194742.html

Eretz Yisrael: Lawless, Corrupt and Dysfunctional ~ by Stephen Lendman

by Stephen Lendman on August 19, 2011



What do you call a country that persecutes occupied people and one-fifth of its own population for not being Jewish? An illegal occupier for over 44 years, suffocating over 1.6 million Gazans under siege! A nation practicing torture, persecution, and racism as official policies! A modern day Sparta, glorifying wars and violence!

A country spurning rule of law principles! An unparalleled regional state terrorist! A nuclear armed global threat! A society of extreme social inequality! A nation with no legitimacy for all of the above reasons, besides having stolen another people’s nation violently!

It’s called Eretz Yisrael – Israel, a nation where thousands of fed up Jews vote with their feet and leave regularly. Like America, Israel isn’t fit to live in. One day perhaps that will be its epitaph.

Many Jews and analysts believe Zionism is destroying Judaism. In his book “Overcoming Zionism,” Joel Kovel explained how it fosters “imperialist expansion and militarism (with) signs of the fascist malignancy,” adding that it turned Israel “into a machine for the manufacture of human rights abuses.”
Author Alan Hart calls Zionism “the real enemy of the Jews,” an ideology contemptuous of moral and ethical principles. Others call it corrosive, destructive, racist, extremist, undemocratic and hateful, espousing violence, not peaceful coexistence.

Nations living by the sword in the end die by it. Israel and America aren’t exceptions. They’ve, in fact, partnered on a self-destructive mission, perhaps taking planet earth with them before they’re through.
Daily snapshots make the case. Multiple US wars rage, spending trillions of badly needed dollars waging them, besides diverting billions more annually to support Israel’s out-of-control militarism. They endanger every other nation and their own, at the same time sacrificing homeland needs.
Lawless, corrupt and dysfunctional barely describe what some call a blight on humanity, threatening it by its presence with its Washington paymaster/partner.

In mid-August, one of its prominent rabbis, Yosef Elitzur, co-author of the controversial book “The King’s Torah,” was denied UK entry for advocating discrimination against gentiles and killing them. The book states:
“Anywhere where the presence of a gentile poses a threat to Israel, it is permissible to kill him, even if it a righteous gentile who is not responsible for the threatening situation.”
In January 2010, co-author Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, head of a prominent yeshiva in the West Bank Yitzhar settlement, was arrested for torching a Palestinian Yasuf village mosque. Later, however, he was released uncharged.

In August 2010, Elitzur was also arrested for his advocacy of violence, though he, too, was released and charges against him quietly dropped.

However, their extremism isn’t unique. On August 19, 2010, Ynet News said “(d)ozens of rabbis, educators, public figures and right-wing activists attended” a rally for Rabbis Dov Lior and Yaakov Yosef “who refused to report for police questioning over their endorsement of” Elitzur and Shapira’s book.

Senior rabbis support them, believing it’s OK to kill non-Jews, a shocking indictment of what too many in Israel believe, including top officials.

It plays out daily in real time, including on August 16 when Israeli soldiers shot and killed a mentally disabled child, 400 meters inside the border separating Israel from Gaza, east of Deir al-Balah. In fact, 10 bullets struck his head and chest. He never had a chance.

Israeli radio merely said soldiers observed someone approaching the security fence, opened fire and shot him.

The same day, other shelling and shooting incidents occurred, killing one man and seriously wounding two others in Gaza City. In addition, another man and a child were wounded in Khan Yunis and Rafah in southern Gaza.

The Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) called these incidents “part of a series of war crimes (regularly) committed by” Israeli forces in Occupied Palestine, reflecting the “total disregard for the lives of Palestinian civilians.”

When state-sponsored violence is institutionalized, is it surprising that perhaps many prominent Israelis (including influential rabbis) endorse racism and killing non-Jews!

What better example of a sick society, deserving universal condemnation, especially by righteously indignant Jews wanting no part of what’s so lawlessly repugnant. In fact, growing numbers of Jews and others understand what’s happening and reject it.

Numerous daily examples highlight the problem. On August 18, Haaretz covered several, including Netanyahu again refusing to apologize to Turkey for murdering nine of its citizens during the infamous May 2010 Mavi Marmara attack in international waters.

At the time, universal outrage condemned it. In contrast, Israeli officials, like their Washington counterparts, believe they never have to say they’re sorry, even when caught red-handed and denounced.

A second Haaretz article quoted Netanyahu’s outgoing director general, Eyal Gabai, saying “(t)he current government will not deliver Israelis a welfare state,” despite weeks of mass protests across Israel demanding it, wanting years of social injustice reversed.

Combined, neoliberalism and Zionism are suffocating Israel, a topic an August 18 Gideon Levy commentary addressed titled, “Israel’s swinish Zionism ought to be stopped,” saying:

As an MK, Shimon Peres coined the term “swinish capitalism,” referring to then finance minister Netanyahu. “It’s worth remembering that there is also swinish Zionism,” Levy added.

Ads
“Swine are insatiable….gorg(ing) themselves until they die.” Capitalism and Zionism are no different. What began as a national movement to establish a Jewish homeland ended up “caus(ing) grave injustice to the previous inhabitants of the land….” And for years, it’s neoliberal version has been harming Jews.

Perhaps if Zionism “stop(ped)….reined in its lust and greed, atoned for the original injustices in 1948 and changed direction, it would have become an admired movement.” Because it didn’t, “Israel is only beginning to pay the price.”

Many of Israel’s wealthy “also started out well….But here too,” their appetite proved insatiable. The time of reckoning has arrived. People want redress. “The word ‘tycoon’ has become a curse and ‘wealthy’ has nearly become despicable.”

Today a new awakening is emerging. Israel’s wealthy are “beginning to pay the price.” Zionism so far escaped. Calling it swinish is heretical.

“But when the time for the reckoning comes we’ll ask: Why didn’t we stop (it) in time,” especially its reliance on violence, occupation, racism, social injustice, and lawlessness.

Policies that extreme can’t go on forever, and won’t! Not in Israel, America or anywhere!

A Final Comment

On August 18, Maan News reported two shooting attacks on buses near Eilat, Israel, killing at least seven and injuring dozens more. Israel’s Channel 10 said three militants armed with Kalashnikovs opened fire on one bus from a car.

A second incident occurred near Netafim, Israel, injuring others. In addition, an explosive device wounded more.

“Assailants also attacked a second bus and a car soon after,” according to Al-Arabiya, killing five.
“In a third incident, mortars were reportedly fired at Israeli forces near the southern border causing injuries, although initial reports were ambiguous about” their origin.

Israel’s knee-jerk reaction came as expected, Defense Minister Ehud Barak blaming Hamas, saying “(w)e will exhaust all measures against the terrorists.”

Senior Hamas official Salah Bardawil rejected Barak’s accusation, saying Israel, ahead of another Gaza attack, blamed Hamas and other Gaza groups to deflect attention from its own internal problems.
Since mid-July, unprecedented numbers of Israelis have rallied for social justice so far denied. It thus begs the question whether these attacks may have been a false flag diversions, to focus attention on “terrorist” threats, not economic hardship.

So far, the identity of attackers is unknown. Nonetheless, Haaretz said “Israeli Defense Forces struck targets in (Gaza) Thursday evening, hours after the earlier incidents.”

Reports indicate at least six killed, others injured. Giving no details, Israel confirmed the strikes, saying operations were underway in southern Gaza.

Explaining nothing about daily atrocities US forces commit against innocent civilians in multiple wars, Hillary Clinton “condemn(ed) today’s attacks in southern Israel and all acts of terrorism in the strongest terms,” calling them “brutal” and “cowardly.”

As expected, she added that America “stand(s) by Israel as our friend, partner, and ally – now and always,” omitting mention of their state-sponsored terrorism against victims unable to fight back.
What better description of two global bullies, rogue state sponsors of intimidation, terror and torment as standard operations. Calling them democracies is ludicrous and offensive.

* Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon

http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2011/08/19/eretz-yisrael-lawless/

#Gaza …. and Another Child Martyr – in pictures



Shaheed Mahmoud Abu Samra, 13 years old


Shaheed Malek Shaath, 2 year old


Shaheed Mahmoud Abu Samra, 13 years old


How many more dead corpses of Palestine’s Children does the international community need to see in order to act? 

How many more cruelties and violations of Human Rights, Regulations and International Law will be needed to intervene so this ongoing warcrime is being stopped once and for all.

How many corpses and traumatized people, does the world need, to stop this ongoing genocide on Palestine, which is happening under the noses of the ignorant kept world for 63 years now.
Ignorance is over. The media silent, but we will not forget the Shuhada.

http://occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/gaza-and-another-child-martyr-picture/

Blame the Gazans— Punish them

According to the Palestine Papers, Saeb Erekat, the so-called chief Palestinian negotiator, once stated, “”If someone sneezes in Tel Aviv, I get the flu in Jericho.”

That was probably the only thing that makes sense Erekat ever said regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Except it wasn’t actually true, unless we think of Erekat, at the moment he made that statement, as every Palestinian in Gaza and replace “Jericho” with “Gaza”. So “if someone sneezes in Tel Aviv, Palestinians in Gaza were soon to be blame for it.”

Yesterday, as I woke up to the news of an attack that took place in Eilat, some 20 kilometeres south of Israel, the first thing that ever came to my mind was, “who the hell did it?”

As my brother excitedly narrated to me the details of the oddly mysterious incident, I was asinine enough to wish the assailants weren’t from Gaza. I naively said to my brother, “let’s hope they don’t turn out to be Gazans.”

Immediately then, I frenziedly went through reports of the incidents on the internet, hoping against hope the blame wouldn’t be placed upon Gaza or at least by some miraculous power, some organization outside of Gaza would officially adopt the attacks and relieve the Gazans of this insane irrationality where the Palestinians in Gaza would be eventually held responsible and “pay a heavy price” for the crimes they never committed.

Only on my previous post on this blog, I wrote, “I was being punished for a misdemeanor I never committed in the first place,” Of course, I didn’t know then that my words were as prognostic as to come into play a couple of days afterwards. 

Soon enough, I was skimming a bit of news related to the incident under the title, “Barak: Gaza is the source of terrorist attacks on southern Israel”

My mind at that exact moment was this way, “but man, wait, that’s not true. I mean no one in Gaza claimed responsibility for the attack, you know, Hamas would have done, had it been them but err, I mean, you can’t just say it’s Gaza when it’s not bla bla bla”

Baloney. He wouldn’t listen. Or he wouldn’t have to listen. And he wouldn’t believe me. And he wouldn’t bother who claimed responsibility and who didn’t. And to be more accurate, that’s exactly what the so-called IDF wanted; that’s what they had been waiting for. An excuse, no matter how lame, baseless and prejudiced it might be, to exercise its favorite habit of bombing, demolishing and killing Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip.

In fact, Israel never needed a pretext to start bombing Gaza. Israel’s warplanes do every day shell the hell out of Gaza. This was a pretext for exercising extrajudicial execution the outcome of which is still on the rise. And yes, it didn’t take long for the aerial, ground and naval operation to get under way. You can’t tell me Israel would miss this chance.

I tweeted, “”Gaza is the source of terrorist attacks on southern Israel” is as well founded as “Gaza is the source of the Ozone hole” but, yea, whatever!”

Who cares on what basis Barak’s accusing finger is pointed— exactly the same way Netanyahu’s is pointed in the photo of the above piece— toward the Palestinians in Gaza claiming they perpetrated the Eilat attacks? No basis whatsoever except the very one on which Israel is truthfully regarded as an Apartheid state: the Palestinians in Gaza are no Jews.

But what if by any means Palestinian militants in Gaza are behind the Eilat attacks? Why would Israel kill two little children? Collateral damage? Could one, then, consider the six Israeli civilians killed in the attacks as collateral damage, given the fact that two Israeli soldiers were also killed?
Of course, not. I wondered whether my little sister was a bit stupid when she innocently (naively?) commented on the Eilat attacks saying, “ya haram!” (oh pity!)? Or was that the honest and unimpeachably good-natured involuntary reflex of an innocent girl commenting on the death of another?

I knew I had the same feelings as she did, but after all it wasn’t thoughtful to display such emotions publicly this way. At least for the memory of the several would-be martyrs paying the “heavy price” the Israeli prime minister referred to.

Couldn’t it be that Mahmoud— a boy aging thirteen years just like my sister who made the above remark is— had the same comment, the same feelings, when he came to know Israeli civilians were killed in the attack— Off record:  three massive bombs just hit the area nearby, and Israeli warplanes are intensely flying over Gaza city at the moment.

Why was Mahmoud killed then?

Is that the way Israel will keep lashing out, indiscriminately killing innocent civilians in blind retaliation? Isn’t this “violence, brutality and a cowardly act of terrorism against innocent civilians”, Mrs. Clinton?

Or perhaps this is a life not worth feeling sorry for— oh dear, I can say I literally write under the fire. That was one of our missiles, you know.  Why wouldn’t the U.S. president and his secretary offer their “deepest condolences” for the families of these little children as well?

Indeed, that Obama is the first Black American president was the biggest lie in the U.S. presidential history. He looks awfully whiter than the other wealthy Zionist white congressmen.

Gaza is a Palestinian territory occupied by Israeli military forces and has been living under siege for more than five years. Those people living in the Gaza Strip are the real victims. They are the real oppressed. There is a humanitarian crisis, a collective punishment, injustice, and occupation that needs to be addressed. Israel should be held accountable for its crimes against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip before we go about criticizing the people for firing few missiles onto their oppressor as an act of protest and defiance. Violence is never inflicted by the oppressed. US-made F16s, Apaches, unmanned overhead drones, gigantic warships, Merkava and other tanks and this whole massive war machine are the real sources of violence.

Indeed, as a friend put it, “the only ‘self-defense’ justified by a colonial occupier is to withdraw from those occupied lands. Very, very simple.” And “Israel justifying this massacre as self-defense is like a robber justifying killing the victim because they wouldn’t hand over their wallet.”


http://electronicintifada.net/blog/mohammed-suliman/blame-gazans-punish-them
 
Mohammed Suliman's picture
Mohammed Rabah Suliman, 21, is a Palestinian student and blogger from Gaza. Mohammed is an English Literature graduate and will undertake graduate studies at the London School of Economics this September. He blogs at Gaza Diaries of Peace and War, and can be followed on Twitter.

Fake flexibility from London’s Israel lobby

Predictably, the European Union responded quickly to yesterday’s violence in Southern Israel. “I condemn unreservedly all such acts of terror,” the bloc’s foreign policy chief Catherine Asthon said.
Will Ashton be issuing another statement today to denounce the Israeli military in similarly strong terms for murdering an infant in Gaza a few hours later? Or for ending a teenager’s life in the early hours of this morning? I’m sure that she won’t. The most we can expect is that she will call for “restraint” (that weasel word which diplomats have rendered meaningless through overuse).

And did she post something on her website expressing revulsion at how Israeli troops shot dead Sa’d al-Majdalwai, a 17 year old with a mental disability, also in Gaza earlier this week? Of course, she didn’t. Why? Because he was too low down in the hierarchy of victims to get noticed. And because the European Union applies different standards to the Israeli forces of occupation and the Palestinians who resist them. Violence by Israel is “regrettable” (or, in most cases, elicits no comment); violence by Palestinians is always categorized as “terrorism”.

A phony plea for understanding

Ashton may try to appear balanced — she has repeatedly criticized the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank — but, in reality, there is little to distinguish her from former colleagues in the British parliament such as Lorna Fitzsimons. Who, you might ask? Fitzsimons was an elected representative of the Tony Blair-led Labor Party in Westminster between 1997 and 2005. After losing her seat, she took up a job running a propaganda outfit called the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM).

Fitzsimons had an opinion piece published by The Guardian in London this week, in which she sought to come across all reasonable. Purporting to be a big fan of mutual understanding, she patted her own back for organizing a “roundtable discussion” recently, where representatives of Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud and the Palestinian party Fatah chatted amiably. She proceeded to illustrate how she has no interest in understanding the concerns of Palestinians by insisting “there cannot be a mass return of Palestinian refugees to [present-day] Israel.”

War criminal in London

BICOM’s team includes a “senior visiting fellow” named Michael Herzog. He is a retired brigadier-general from the Israeli army. During Operation Cast Lead, that relentless three-week assault on Gaza’s civilians in late 2008 and early 2009, Herzog was chief of staff to Ehud Barak, Israel’s defense minister. As he was involved in planning that operation and advising on strategy, Herzog must be held accountable for the war crimes committed in its execution. Next time he pops into BICOM’s London offices for a cup of tea and some blue-sky thinking, the police should be alerted and be ready to arrest him.

Herzog has at least done one good thing: he has proven that BICOM’s declared belief that Israel should display “considerable flexibility” (as Fitzsimons wrote in her Guardian article) amounts to waffle. In a new briefing paper for the center, Herzog contends that any future Palestinian state would have to be non-militarized but that Israel would maintain a long-term military presence along the Jordan River.

So while the Palestinians could have nothing more destructive in their arsenal than pea-shooters, the West Bank would remain surrounded by one of the world’s most powerful armies. That, it appears, is what the Israel lobby means by flexibility.

http://electronicintifada.net/blog/david/fake-flexibility-londons-israel-lobby
 
David Cronin is the author of Europe’s Alliance With Israel: Aiding the Occupation (Pluto Press, 2011). He has written for a wide variety of publications, including The Guardian, The Wall Street Journal Europe, European Voice, the Inter Press Service, The Irish Times and The Sunday Tribune. As a political activist, he has attempted to place both Tony Blair and Avigdor Lieberman under citizen’s arrest for crimes against humanity.

CEMEX tries to reason away complicity in Israeli violations of international law

In May, The Electronic Intifada documented the illegal mining and the transportation of construction material from Yatir and Nahal Raba quarries in the occupied West Bank into Israel. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre in London published the article and invited CEMEX and Heidelberg Cement to respond. Heidelberg Cement remained silent, but CEMEX tried to reason away its complicity in Israel’s violations of international law.

Illegal mining of Palestinian natural resources

In a statement of 28 June, CEMEX confirms that its subsidiary Lime & Stone is “in a partnership with Kfar Giladi Quarries which operates the Yatir quarry”. The Yatir quarry is located in the south Hebron Hills in the occupied West Bank. CEMEX clarifies that the Civil Administration in Judea and Samaria issued the permits and receives the royalties for Yatir quarry. However, this arrangement is contrary to international law.

The video below documents the transport of construction material from Yatir quarry into Israel on 16 May 2011.


The International Court of Justice reaffirmed the Palestinian people’s right of self-determination and Israel’s status as the occupying power in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, in 2004. As the occupier, Israel is bound by the Hague Regulations of 1907. According to an interpretation of Article 55 that is clearly applicable to quarrying by Julius Stone, a former Professor of Jurisprudence and International Law at the University of Sydney, the article “forbids wasteful or negligent destruction of the capital value, whether by excessive cutting or mining or other abusive exploitation, contrary to the rules of good husbandry”. UN General Assembly Resolution 1803, passed in 1962, states that permanent sovereignty over natural wealth and resources is a “basic constituent of the right to self-determination.” The Palestinian people own the natural wealth in the OPT.

In its statement, CEMEX claims that the operations “including those in Israel strictly comply with all relevant legal requirements.” I asked Israeli attorney Shlomy Zachary for a comment. He said that “the West Bank is not Israel and the laws applicable there are different”. Zachary was involved in legal action by the Israeli human rights organization Yesh Din in 2009 to halt illegal mining activity in the West Bank. Zachary clarified: “Yesh Din’s petition argues that the whole mechanism and permits to dig in this land are illegal. Therefore, any acts committed based on illegal permits can be allegedly illegal as well.”

Recently, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, addressed the issue on the occasion of the International Day of the World’s Indigenous People, “Many States maintain contradictory or antiquated laws on mining and land acquisition for development. These laws must be re-assessed to determine if they are consistent with international human rights standards and principles.”

CEMEX’s presence in the West Bank

In its reply to Business & Human Rights, CEMEX confirms the operation of three ready-mix concrete plants in the settlements of Mishor Adumim, Mevoh Horon and Atarot by its Israeli subsidiary Ready Mix. In 2004, the International Court of Justice determined that Israel’s wall and settlement construction in occupied territory were illegal under international law. An occupying power is not allowed to transfer its population to the territory it occupies. The same applies to the occupied Syrian Golan Heights.

Again, CEMEX claims that the plants have “all the permits and licenses necessary according to applicable laws”. The company states that according to the Oslo Accords the plants are in “areas under the control and responsibility of Israel, until a permanent agreement is reached between the parties”. Zachary’s comment: “But the land for itself and the land in area C are still under occupation, and first and foremost the laws governing the area are the laws of occupation, including Article 55 of the Hague Regulations. The fact that there are other agreements between the parties does not matter and cannot nullify the international laws of occupation or to substitute them.“

CEMEX does not try to justify its operations in the occupied Golan Heights in its statement. The same applies to the provision of concrete elements for the construction of Israel’s wall and military checkpoints in the West Bank and of concrete for the construction of Israel’s controversial Jerusalem Light Rail project. The project strengthens Israel’s grip on the greater Jerusalem area by connecting West Jerusalem with several settlements in or surrounding occupied East Jerusalem.

CEMEX continues to violate UN Global Compact principles

CEMEX has endorsed the principles of the UN Global Compact. The UN Global Compact is a strategic policy initiative for businesses that are committed to sustainability and responsible business practices.

The first two principles of the Global Compact state that businesses should support and respect the protection of international human rights within their spheres of influence, and make sure they are not complicit in human rights abuses.

Although CEMEX is fully aware of its involvement in Israel’s violations of international law in the occupied West Bank and the Golan Heights, it shows no sign of changing its policy. At present, CEMEX acts like Veolia did when it learned about the illegality of the Jerusalem Light Rail project in 2005. Veolia did not take criticism seriously and refused a dialogue with public investors. That is why the international BDS movement has been holding Veolia to account for years by calling on investors to divest from and local authorities to do no business with the company. 

http://electronicintifada.net/blog/adri-nieuwhof/cemex-tries-reason-away-complicity-israeli-violations-international-law

IDF promotes colonel who encouraged violent interrogations


Colonel Itai Virob, who won notoriety when he admitted he encouraged his soldiers to use violence against Palestinians they were questioning, will become a brigadier general soon 


The IDF Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Binyamin Ganz, decided (Hebrew)  to promote Colonel Itai Virob, formerly the commander of the designated occupation brigade Kfir, to brigadier general. Virob will be appointed to the office of Chief Infantry and Paratroopers Officer, a plum assignment which generally indicates the officer will become an aluf, in Israel not merely a major general but also a member of the General Staff Forum.

If the name of Virob rings a bell, it’s probably because he’s the senior officer who admitted in court he allowed his soldiers to perform some acts of violence (Hebrew).  For the purposes of questioning, Virob said – he was defending one of his junior officers, charged with assault of a Palestinian – he found that “a slap, sometime a blow to the back of the neck or the chest, sometimes kneeing [in the stomach? Unclear – YZG] or strangling [is required] for the purposes of calming” the detainee during an “impromptu interrogation”. The plain truth caused a minor shit storm, Virob’s promotion was delayed, and he was officially rebuked by his commanding general. Two years have passed, and now Virob, too, is a general.

Turns out, if you’re an IDF officer and you’re ordering your gunmen to violate human rights and military law, and they do (as mentioned above, Virob’s order was exposed during a rare trial of Kfir soldiers who tortured Palestinians; we’ll probably never know how many Palestinians were beaten under Virob’s order), you will not be prosecuted, you will not be expelled from the ranks of the even-more-moral-than-Hamas army, you will not be demoted; your promotion will merely be delayed, and as compensation you’ll receive one hell of a job.

But that’s not the whole story. When Virob testified, he was admired military reporters and IDF gunmen alike for “telling truth to power” to judges sitting in air-conditioned halls. The fact that Virob, like any senior officer, also spends most of his time in air conditioned bureaus was conveniently forgotten. He was considered as an officer standing for his gunmen.

That’s not the case, however. Virob was summoned to testify in the trial of one of the other gunmen, a grunt, not an officer. And there, after being officially rebuked, he changed his tune so much from his earlier testimony, the court rebuked the officers who rebuked Virob, saying – strangely enough – this amounted to obstruction of justice. When you peel back the layers of obfuscation, it seems the court was strongly hinting Virob was perjuring himself during this second testimony.

So this great defender of the gunmen turns out yet another officer in a long and dishonored IDF tradition of selling your soldiers down the river in exchange for a promotion. Strangely enough, the gunmen never seem to remember that an officer promising them it will be fine and he’ll be there for them if they break the law will in all likelihood drop them like smelling socks if they are caught in the act.

So, next time some fool tells with high zest to children ardent for some desperate glory that old lie, that the IDF is a moral army capable of investigating itself, feel free to laugh in his face. And the next time someone decides to skip the IDF system of justice and just go straight to Hague, Binyamin Ganz, who promoted an open endorser of violent interrogation, should blame himself only.

http://972mag.com/idf-promotes-torture-endorsing-colonel-to-general/

Are ’supporters’ being hired to attend Glenn Beck rally?

An ad on Janglo seeks people to serve as ambassadors for their countries of origin at Glenn Beck’s Restoring Courage rally. Will they get paid? “Depends where you’re from”

By Mya Guarnieri


Conservative talk-radio host Glenn Beck (photo: Gage Skidmore / CC BY-SA 2.0)

The uber-conservative Christian Zionist commentator Glenn Beck has arrived in Israel. He will hold his “Restoring Courage” rally in Jerusalem on August 24.
So it seems like a mighty odd coincidence that a few weeks ago, I found this ad on Janglo:

On August 24 2011 there is a huge international event being held in Jerusalem where people are coming to stand with Israel.
At the event there are flags from every country and we are looking for people to be the ambassador for their country….
We are looking for people who were either born in or had a parent or grand-parent from numerous different countries…..
Please note, Albania, Australia, Belgium, Botswana, Canada, Colombia, Congo, Cuba, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Kosovo, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Mali, Mexico, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Palau, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and United States are full
If you have a connection to any country not mentioned above please be in contact.
Thank you !
I emailed the contact listed. I included the link to the ad and asked a straightforward question: “will you be paying people for their participation in this event?”

I received a response from Jonny Daniels—Senior Advisor to MK Danny Danon (Likud)—who wrote “Depends where you are from.” So, in other words, that means at least some of those who attend might be getting paid to do so.
————————————–
Mya Guarnieri is a Tel Aviv-based writer and journalist.

http://972mag.com/are-demonstrators-being-hired-to-attend-glenn-beck-rally/

Who is behind the Eilat terror attack?

The horrific terror attacks in Oslo some weeks ago provided a valuable lesson for journalists. Almost as soon as the attacks took place, journalists throughout the world rushed to place blame on Al Qaeda. Jennifer Rubin, a conservative blogger at the Washington Post known for her extreme views on Israeli politics, wrote that the attacks were committed by Al-Qaeda terrorists and used them to attack President Barak Obama’s foreign policy objectives in Iraq and Afghanistan. Her piece was left unchanged on the Washington Post website for a full 24 hours despite evidence that the perpetrator of the attack was, in fact, a right wing Christian fanatic not connected to Al-Qaeda.

Yesterday morning, Israel was rocked by a triple terror attack which left eight people dead and moved the country to a state of high alert. Within hours of the attack, Israel began a series of aggressive airstrikes on targets in the Gaza Strip, claiming that they were reprisal attacks against the Palestinian leadership who gave the order for the Eilat operations. However, Israeli officials and their spokespeople in the media failed to provide factual evidence clearly proving responsibility. The airstrikes killed a number of senior operatives in the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC), a terror group with weak links to Hamas, as well as civilians including at least one child. The speed at which Israel began airstrikes in Gaza without providing factual evidence of PRC’s involvement raises questions concerning the existence of a premeditated Israeli plan to launch a summer offensive against the population of Gaza. For the record, Hamas has publicly stated numerous times in the past 24 hours that it had nothing to do with the terror attacks in Eilat.

Screenshot of Barak Ravid's twitter feed

Twitter feed belonging to Barak Ravid, diplomatic correspondent for Haaretz
Despite uncertainty over those responsible for the attacks yesterday, Israeli journalists were quick to pass on government hearsay as fact. Barak Ravid, diplomatic correspondent for Haaretz, rushed to place responsibility on the PRC for the terror attacks on his Twitter feed. When I asked him to provide factual proof for his claim other than citing anonymous sources, he responded, “This is what I know from my sources. You can choose to believe or not to, like every article I publish in Haaretz.”


Shouldn’t one evaluate Ravid’s reports and claims based on the factual material which he presents? Since when does “belief” play a central role in a reporter’s credibility on specific military issues? Without knowing Ravid’s sources, it is difficult to ‘believe’ and judge them on their credibility. Ravid was not alone in placing blame on PRC as most of the international media outlets adopted the Israeli government line.


Screenshot of Barak Ravid's twitter feed
Screenshot of Barak Ravid's twitter feed

In recent months, Ravid has relied on unsubstantiated Israeli government sources for pieces which amount to glorified hearsay without basis in reality. Earlier this summer Ravid wrote a piece propagating Israeli government rumors that activists on board this year’s flotilla “may be bringing chemical substances on the ships to use against Israeli soldiers to prevent them from boarding the ships.”

Oslo should be a warning that rushing to place blame on a group for a horrific terror act without factual proof reflects poor journalistic ethics. In the Israeli context, placing blame on the PRC effectively legitimatizes Israeli airstrikes on Gaza. At the time of this writing there has been no claim of responsibility and the only proof that PRC is behind these terror attacks comes from Israeli government officials who do not cite any specific or verifiable source.  The PRC very well might be behind these attacks but the “shoot first, ask questions later” principle, accepted as mantra in Israel, often results in the loss of innocent life and should not be a fixture of Israeli journalistic ethics.

UPDATE 18:16–

The Jerusalem Post is reporting that the PRC has praised the Eilat terror attack but denied responsibility in carrying it out. Speaking with the AFP, a PRC spokesman in Gaza said, “”The occupation wants to pin this operation on us in order to escape its own internal problems.” Israel maintains that the PRC is responsible for the attacks but has yet to release any verifiable proof connecting the Gaza based group to the attack which has so far claimed eight lives.

Read more about the Eilat terror attacks:

Dimi Reider – News coverage of the shooting and bombing
Yossi Gurvitz – Why Israel shouldn’t attack Gaza

http://972mag.com/who-is-behind-the-eilat-terror-attack/

FILLING IN THE BLANKS ON ‘TERROR’ ATTACK

STILL TOO EARLY TO TELL WHAT HAPPENED IN ISRAEL …. SO LET’S MAKE UP THE STORY
*
We’ve even learned how to ‘doctor’ photos ;)
*
It is still too early to tell whether the terrorists who carried out Thursday’s attacks exited Egypt, passed through Sinai and headed south toward the region of Eilat, or if this was the action of a terrorist cell of Islamic origins, acting for some time already in Sinai. In any case, it is clear that the Egyptian revolution that began in Tahrir Square and spread through other Arab states has now made its way into Israel.
*
That’s not the version we were fed yesterday by the Israeli press… now it’s ‘We don’t know what happened’.
*
Mubarak’s fall will lead to Israel’s demise? Is that what they want us to believe now? Read the following from HaAretz to see this viewpoint…
*

Mubarak falls, Sinai terror rises

The series of terror attacks near Eilat on Thursday indicate that the Egyptians are losing their grip on Sinai.

The series of terror attacks that took place early Thursday afternoon on the road leading from the Israeli-Egyptian border to Eilat did not come as a surprise to Israel’s senior security officials. They had expected it would occur at some stage or another.
The escalating security situation in the Sinai Peninsula, continuous work on the new border barrier and the frustration of terror groups within the Gaza Strip who – for some time now – have not managed to successfully carry out a terror attack from within the Strip, all pointed at the likelihood of an attempt to attack via the Egyptian border.

It is still too early to tell whether the terrorists who carried out Thursday’s attacks exited Egypt, passed through Sinai and headed south toward the region of Eilat, or if this was the action of a terrorist cell of Islamic origins, acting for some time already in Sinai. In any case, it is clear that the Egyptian revolution that began in Tahrir Square and spread through other Arab states has now made its way into Israel.

Over the past few months, Israel has allowed the Egyptian army to increase its forces in Sinai a number of times, allowing much larger Egyptian forces there than the Camp David Accords allowed for, including the entry of thousands of Egyptian soldiers and tanks in the El Arish region and northern Sinai, within the framework of a widespread mission against al-Qaida. It is now evident that the Egyptian efforts alone are not enough, and that the Israel Defense Forces – who over the past three decades has been able to reduce its forces along the Egyptian border, focusing instead on reinforcing the northern border, West Bank and Gaza Strip – will now have-to strengthen its presence in the south.

This is not just a case of transferring security forces. There is a far greater need to complete the construction of the southern border and its fortification via advanced observation posts, which requires hundreds of millions of shekels in increased funding for the security budget. The Finance Ministry’s spin two days ago about halving the security budget ended within 48 hours, as the gunmen opened fire near Eilat.

Beyond the financial aspect, Israel’s security heads will need to get used to a state in which, as it seems, they cannot depend on its ally, the Egyptian army, to protect its southern front.
Source
*
‘Terror Timetable’ … also from HaAretz
*

Timeline / Eight hours of terror in southern Israel

A series of terrorist attacks took place near Eilat on Thursday, killing at least six people and wounding dozens.



* 12:00 P.M. – Terror cell fires at Egged bus from a private vehicle, 7 hurt
* 12:30 P.M. – IDF forces called to the scene of the attack hurt by explosive device
* 12:35 P.M. – Mortar shells fired from Egypt into Israel, no one hurt
* 13:10 P.M. – Terror cell fires anti-tank missile toward private vehicle near border, 7 hurt
* 13:11 P.M. – Another anti-tank missile fired toward private vehicle, six people killed
* 18:00 P.M. – IDF begins military strike on Gaza, killing at least six Palestinians
* 19:00 P.M. – Fresh firefights erupt in southern Israel, 2 people gravely injured
*
Solution….. BOMB GAZA!
Why?
Because they can!

*
Photo Essay of Victims of Israeli strike on Gaza ( click HERE to view)
*

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/filling-in-the-blanks-on-terror-attack/