Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Israeli Illegal Settlements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israeli Illegal Settlements. Show all posts

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Israel gangs up on Palestinians

Despite knowing that settlements have broken the peace process, Israel is forging ahead with plans to build new Jew-only colonies on Arab land, writes Khaled Amayreh in occupied Jerusalem

Click to view caption
Palestinians use sling-shots to hurl stones at Israeli troops during a protest against the expansion of the Jewish settlement of Halamish near Ramallah

Taking advantage of the ongoing turbulence in the Arab world, the proximity of the US presidential elections, and the international community's manifest powerlessness to check aggressive Israeli unilateralism, the Israeli government has been stepping up hostile measures against the largely unprotected Palestinian community.

The measures, which include the seizure of a large swathe of Palestinian-owned land for settlement expansion, wanton home demolition as well as unrelenting attacks and acts of vandalism against Palestinians and their property, are aimed at rendering unrealistic and impossible the goal of establishing a viable and territorially contiguous Palestinian state on the West Bank.

The latest colonialist Israeli scheme would confiscate thousands of acres of mostly privately owned Arab land south of Bethlehem. This week, the Israeli occupation army approved the establishment of a new permanent settlement south of the Biblical city. The new settlement would include a large farm as well other infrastructure. It would also cut off the southern West Bank -- the Hebron region -- from the Bethlehem and Ramallah regions, putting an end to Palestinian demographic continuity in the vicinity.

Virtually powerless Palestinian Authority (PA) officials described Israel's plans to build a new settlement as "outrageous". One PA official labelled the new expansion scheme as an "act of rape".

PA spokespersons appealed to Egypt and the European Union to condemn and actively oppose Israeli plans, rightly described as "effective decapitation of the last hopes for a dignified peace in the region".

Israel has already seized numerous square kilometres of land throughout the West Bank, especially in the Jerusalem region and Jordan Valley. According to the Israeli human rights organisation B'tselem, the Israeli government built as many as 2500 settler units in 2011 on land occupied in 1967.
Israel has established as many as 270 settlements of various sizes in the West Bank, which many cartographers, demographers and political experts contend has killed any realistic prospect for the implementation of the two-state solution.

Israel, observers opine, feels safe and nearly immune from American pressure in light of the approaching election season in the United States where criticism of Israel, even if justified, could mean political suicide for the Obama administration as well as other presidential hopefuls.

One Republican presidential hopeful, Newt Gingrich, has told a Jewish American audience that the Palestinians were an "invented people". The obscene canard was apparently meant to procure votes and especially money from the powerful Jewish community.

Israel seems also convinced that the EU, thoroughly preoccupied with its own financial and economic woes, is not in a position to exert meaningful pressure on Israel. Some EU member states, such as Germany, are considered among the closest allies of Tel Aviv.

In addition to stealing more Palestinian territory in broad daylight for settlement expansion, Israel has also been demolishing more Arab homes in various parts of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.
One of the homes demolished in Beit Hanina, a Jerusalem neighbourhood on Sunday, 11 December, belonged to the sister of one of the Palestinian prisoners recently freed as part of the Gilad Shalit swap deal between Israel and Hamas.

The homeowners, the Al-Razem family, accused the Israeli government of punishing the former prisoner by "destroying our home".

"There can be no justice for non-Jews in Israel. I think the Jews have learned the worst thing possible for their former oppressors. Justice for non-Jews doesn't exist in the Jewish lexicon," said Umm Nidal Al-Razem, the sister of the freed prisoner Fouad Al Razem. "They just want to expel us from our land; they want an Arab-free Israel."

According to reliable Jerusalem sources, Israel expelled as many as 800 Palestinian families from East Jerusalem in the past two years. The expulsions, says Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) official Ahmed Qurei are tantamount to silent ethnic cleansing.

Meanwhile, Nazi-like Jewish settlers attacked and vandalised several Palestinian villages and hamlets in the northern West Bank, including Aseera Al-Qibleya near Nablus. Locals and eyewitnesses reported that as many as a hundred heavily armed settlers, dressed in black uniforms, attacked village homes, smashing windows and car windshields. The attackers also fired heavily into the air.

The settlers who had arrived from the nearby Yetzhar settlement went on terrorising Palestinians and vandalising their property for more than 30 minutes before withdrawing to Yetzhar. The Israeli army did very little to restrain the settlers. Palestinians often accused the Israeli army of using the settlers as a paramilitary force to attack and persecute the Palestinian population.

The settlers espouse an extremist doctrine that stipulates that non-Jews livin
g under Jewish religious law, or halacha, ought to be enslaved as water carriers or wood hewers, expelled or physically exterminated.

In another twist of events involving Jewish settlers, scores of settlers, known as hilltop youths, crossed over the River Jordan and seized an old building before returning to the western bank of the river. An Israeli spokesman said the setters were protesting Jordanian pressure on Israel to reconsider plans to destroy a bridge in East Jerusalem, near Al-Aqsa Mosque, known as the Maghariba Bridge, which the Palestinians and Arab states consider a serious alteration of the status quo in the city.

Israel is claiming the wooden ramp leading from the Buraq Wall, known in Jewish phraseology as the Wailing Wall or Western Wall, may collapse and will have to be replaced. However, Muslim officials have condemned Israeli plans as part of Israeli efforts to obliterate the Islamic identity of East Jerusalem, especially Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Al-Aqsa Mosque, along with its large court and esplanade, is considered the third holiest shrine in Islam.

"This is a violent act that amounts to a declaration of religious war on the Muslim holy place," said one Hamas official in the Gaza Strip.

The Israeli government has asked the municipality of Jerusalem, which is controlled by Talmudic and right-wing Jewish groups, to postpone work on the wooden bridge, apparently due to Jordanian and Egyptian pressure.

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2011/1076/re1.htm

Thursday, December 8, 2011

How about an Israeli destruction freeze?

Obama should demand an immediate halt to all Israeli destruction of Palestinian property in the West Bank.
 
Last Modified: 08 Dec 2011 14:10
 
 
Many Palestinians have been left homeless after occupying Israeli forces demolished their homes [EPA]

Washington, DC - Much was made of what many in the media described as a "confrontation" between Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama over the building of illegal Israeli settlements (or colonies) in Occupied Palestinian Territory. From the very beginning of the Obama administration, the pursuit of a freeze on Israeli settlement activity was a stated goal - one that was never really accomplished and never adequately pursued.

The idea of a settlement freeze, which was wrongly attributed to the now-resigned special envoy George Mitchell, was actually stipulated in the Bush administration's Road Map and accepted by the parties in 2003. A freeze on all settlement activity was a first-phase Israeli obligation - not to mention an obligation under international law. It should go without saying that the Israelis failed to fulfill this obligation, and instead the Israeli government, then led by Ariel Sharon, presided over the single largest and most aggressive period of settlement activity in the West Bank since the Menachem Begin government in 1977-83.
Still, Israeli settlement construction is not the only belligerent behaviour conducted by the occupation regime in Palestinian Territory. To paraphrase the now-former US Congressman Brian Baird, if the law is "thou shall not build on territory which does not belong to you", an equally important corollary of this law is "thou shall not destroy what belongs to others in territory which does not belong to you". Of course, apart from the regular construction of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, there is also the regular destruction of Palestinian buildings and infrastructure in the same territory.

Both the construction of illegal settlements and the destruction of the homes and property of the native Palestinians stem from the same origin: Israel's unbridled assertion of power over the native Palestinians in the context of total impunity.

Much destruction occurs in Area C of the West Bank. This territory comprises roughly 60 per cent of the West Bank, and Israel maintains full control over security, planning and zoning.
The United Nations Organisation for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs in the Occupied Territories (UNOCHA) noted in a recent report:

"In the first six months of 2011, OCHA recorded the Israeli authorities' demolition of 342 Palestinian-owned structures in Area C, including 125 residential structures, displacing a total of 656 Palestinians, including 351 children. This is almost five times as many structures demolished and people displaced as during the equivalent period in 2010."

Take, for example, the time when 30 Israeli vehicles and 100 soldiers entered the village of Ein al-Duyuk and demolished the homes of four different Palestinian families deep in the West Bank. Or the dawn raid of Jaba'a near Hebron which led to the demolition of another family's home. Or the demolition of five homes in Khan al-Ahmar, near Jerusalem, which left 71 people, including 60 children, homeless. Or when a mosque, two homes and a barn housing children's pet rabbits were demolished in the village of Um Fagareh. Or the demolition of wells near Idhna, which debilitated Palestinian farmers. Or Khirbet Susa's rural primary school, which currently educates 36 Palestinian children and has recently received demolition orders after it was last demolished a year ago. Or the solar panel complex, built by a Spanish NGO for €300,000 ($401,310) in 2009 to provide much-needed sustainable electricity to the isolated Palestinian village of Imneizel, which also has demolition orders pending.

Or, perhaps most disturbing of all, is that all of the above-mentioned Area C demolitions and demolition orders were executed or handed down only in the past 90 days.

Israeli destruction of Palestinian homes and buildings, like the construction of illegal settlements, is part of a matrix of control aimed at limiting Palestinians to an existence on only a fraction of a fraction of their land. No objective observer can take the argument that the destruction of Palestinian village schools, water wells, solar panels and homes provides anyone with security. Likewise, Palestinian villagers left homeless at the hands of an Israeli bulldozer will rightly find claims that Israeli politicians want peace to be farcical.

Yet this destruction persists today at accelerated levels, with little objection from an Obama administration that races to show its support for Israel as we enter an election year.

Nevertheless, the Obama administration should demand an immediate halt to all Israeli settlement construction because it is illegal, and an immediate halt to all Israeli destruction in the West Bank because it is simply inhumane.

Yousef Munayyer is the Executive Director of the Palestine Centre in Washington, DC. 

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/12/20111278455696419.html

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Israel plans building 4000 new housing units south of occupied Jerusalem



[ 25/10/2011 - 09:27 AM ]
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC)– The Israeli government has recently endorsed the building of a new Jewish suburb south of occupied Jerusalem that envisages the construction of 4000 housing units, Hebrew press reported on Monday.
Yediot Ahronot said on its website on Monday that the construction and planning committee has endorsed the first stage, which includes the building of 2610 housing units, of the three-stage project.
It added the committee would meet again early next December to endorse the second and third stages of the project, which on completion would be the biggest since the establishment of Jabal Abu Ghuneim suburb.
The report noted that the project would complete the isolation of the southern part of eastern Jerusalem from the West Bank.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

As settlers disrupt olive harvest, Israeli officer declares: “I am the law, I am God.” – in pictures

OCTOBER 23, 2011 BY OCCUPIEDPALESTINE



22 October 2011 | International Solidarity Movement, West Bank
Intimidation of Palestinians in the Israeli-controlled H2 section of Hebron continued today as the Israeli military and settlers harassed Palestinians and international observers as they attempted to pick olives on their land in Tel Rumeida.
Around 40 students from different Palestinian universities marched onto the land at 11AM Saturday morning and began to pick olives along with local families, activists from Youth Against Settlements (YAS) and international observers.
At 12:30 PM the Israeli police confiscated identity passes for 20 Palestinians and, whilst checking their details, forced the group to stand together and individually filmed their faces.
The police declined to justify their actions, only insisting that they had a right to check the details of those present.  The Israeli military became increasingly belligerent as protesters challenged the legality of the actions and began to push and shove Palestinians and international observers.  After around 20 minutes the police returned the passes and allowed the detained Palestinians to leave.  They then ordered international observers to leave the olive groves or be arrested, claiming that the Palestinian-owned olive grove is “Israeli land” and that it was illegal to be on the land and “illegal to be in a group.”
Rafi Dagan, an Israeli commanding officer, stated “I am the law.  I am God” when asked to explain why he was flouting Israeli law by forcing people to leave Palestinian land under threat of arrest, without any paperwork to show that it was a closed military zone.
Earlier in the day, Israeli soldiers had pushed photographers attempting to document the olive harvest and confiscated an international observer’s passport for several minutes.  Under Israeli law, passports may be shown to the Israeli military but it is illegal for them to be taken away.  The Israeli military also briefly detained a young Palestinian man, apparently for running through the olive groves with a Palestinian flag, although he was released after around 10 minutes.
In addition to intimidation by the military, Israeli settlers arrived on the Palestinian land within minutes of the olive harvest beginning and began to harass people picking olives.  A group of around 10 settlers gathered in the lower olive groves in Tel Rumeida at 11:55am where Palestinians were busy picking olives.  Baruch Marzel, a prominent extremist settler, stood on a Palestinian flag in an obvious attempt to provoke olive harvesters.  The military intervened as anger flared between the two groups and sent settlers back to their settlement.
Badia Dwaik, 38, is the Deputy Coordinator of Youth Against Settlements, a nonviolent Palestinian group campaigning against Israeli settlements.  He stressed that olive harvesting in Tel Rumeida is not just about economic necessity; it is a form of political defiance and a way to “confirm our existence and to encourage the people to resist”.
The Palestinian land in Tel Rumeida is surrounded by four illegal Israeli settlements.  A Palestinian educational centre overlooks steep, dusty terraces to the south which contain around 200 olive trees.  The centre, established in 2006 after the building was reclaimed from Israeli military control, and the olive groves below have been subject to repeated attacks and incursions by settlers in recent years.  Anti-Palestinian graffiti and the Star of David is clearly visible under fresh coats of paint on the walls at the back of the building, only metres away from a settlement.
The olive groves contain around 200 olives trees and olives were picked on around 70 trees today.  Badia Dwaik lamented the poor quality of the olives and the sparse fruit on many of the trees, saying that Palestinians are often unable to tend the land for fear of settler attacks.  There is also a chronic shortage of water in Hebron and the owners of the trees are denied permits to dig the land. For example, the YAS reported having problems with water circulation for three days and discovered today that the water lines had been deliberately cut.
According to Badia Dwaik, the YAS intend to continue picking the olives in the coming weeks as “people are scared to come and pick olives alone.  And it gives a message: we will continue and never give up.”

Baruch Marzel, not a fan of Israeli soldiers after they told him to leave


Israeli soldiers, armed with live ammunition attempting to stop media filming the detainment of a Palestinian Teenager


Israeli soldiers as seen in photographs and video, pushing media correspondents as they filmed a Palestinian being detained


Soldiers questioning a Palestinian teenager after they detained him, for running through the olive grove with a Palestinian Flag


Israeli police officer filming the crowd of Palestinian students, activists, and media correspondents


After Police pulled every ID from Palestinians present for the olive harvest, one was detained and questioned by Israeli soldiers and police.


Badia, member of Youth Against Settlements, being pushed away by angry Israeli soldier who continued to shove other activists nearby


Live ammunition in Israeli soldier's guns


Israeli police filming detained Palestinians


Baruch Marzel, extremist Israeli settler, standing on the Palestinian flag he ripped of an olive tree


Baruch Marzel standing on the Palestinian flag with other Israeli Settlers

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Israeli Military Takes Precautions To Prevent Leaks Regarding Removal Of Minor Outposts

Sunday October 09, 2011 12:54author by Saed Bannoura - IMEMC News



According to Israeli sources, the military has taken a number of measures to prevent leaks by soldiers about when minor settlement outposts will be dismantled. This is due to recent occurrences of soldiers sharing information with settlers in order to obstruct the Israeli procedures.
Israeli settlement outpost (image from Boker Tov blog)
Israeli settlement outpost (image from Boker Tov blog)
Since there is a legal draft in Israel, all citizens, including settlers living illegally in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are required to serve in the military for three years. This leads to a mixed allegiance among certain soldiers when they are ordered to remove illegal settlement outposts, and has led to a trend of Israeli soldiers leaking information to settlers in illegal outposts.

The new policy will extend a rule enacted several months ago, in which soldiers living in settlements were not to be told about plans to dismantle outposts. Since that policy did not stop the leaks, the new rule will include all soldiers and officers serving in the West Bank.

According to military officials, only sector commanders will be given the information on when and where outpost removal procedures will take place.

Although Israeli soldiers are not tasked with removing settlement outposts themselves, they serve as security for the Israeli border police and other officers that actually carry out the dismantling of illegal outposts.

The Israeli government has a policy that determines some of the Israeli settlements in the West Bank to be 'legal' and others 'illegal', despite the fact that all Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are considered illegal under international law, as they violate the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits the transfer of civilian populations onto land seized by military force.

Over 500,000 Israeli settlers currently live in settlements on stolen Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem -- 300,000 of these have moved to the settlements in the years since the Oslo Accords in 1993.


http://www.imemc.org/article/62229?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Friday, September 30, 2011

Israel defends settlement expansion

Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:50PM GMT



Israeli officials said the plan is one of the phases of a multi-year process for the expansion of the Gilo neighborhood.
Israel has rejected international criticism over its plan to construct 1,100 new settler units in the occupied East al-Quds (Jerusalem).


Defending Israel's interior ministry decision to build new housing units in the Gilo neighborhood, a senior Israeli official said on Wednesday that the site is neither a settlement nor a settlement outpost but a neighborhood which constitutes an integral part of the center of al-Quds.

Palestinian leaders, however, say Tel Aviv's decision to expand Jewish settlements in Gilo, which mostly lies in the Arab east al-Quds, has effectively rebuffed a recent proposal by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the resumption of direct negotiations.

The United States, China and several European countries have also condemned the Israeli decision, saying it is against the two-state solution.

Gilo is built on the land captured by Israel in 1967. Tel Aviv later annexed the area to the al-Quds municipality in a move not recognized by the international community. Tel Aviv claims that areas within the Jerusalem municipality are not settlements.

The Israeli decision to expand Gilo by several hundred meters to the south came days after Netanyahu, in a speech in the UN General Assembly, invited Palestinians into direct talks, saying the decades long conflict between the two sides will only be resolved through negotiations.

Palestinians have repeatedly said that new round of talks with the Israeli regime cannot be resumed unless there is a complete halt in settlement expansion activities.

The controversial move also came days after Palestinian Authority Chief Mahmoud Abbas handed in his request for full UN membership for an independent Palestinian state.

Palestinians want East al-Quds as the capital of their future state.

HM/PKH/HGH


http://www.presstv.ir/detail/201666.html

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

EU slams Israel settlement expansion

Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:21PM GMT





EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton
The European Union has criticized Israel for its illegal expansion of settlement units in the occupied Palestinian territories.


EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said on Tuesday that Israel's plan to build 1,100 new illegal housing units in East al-Quds (Jerusalem) “undermines the talks with Palestinians and should be reversed,” AP reported.

Ashton also expressed “deep regret” over the ongoing settlement expansion activities.

Israel authorized a plan for construction of 1,100 illegal units in the Gilo neighborhood of East al-Quds (Jerusalem) on Tuesday. Israeli officials said the plan is one of the phases of a multi-year process for the expansion of the Gilo neighborhood.

Meanwhile, Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat described the recent plan as “1,100 No's” to the resumption of Israel-Palestine talks.

Victoria Nuland, the spokesperson for the US State Department, also expressed “deep disappointment” about the Israeli decision.

In September 2010, Israel resumed the expansion of illegal settlements in Palestine after a 10-month partial freeze, prompting the Palestinian Authority (PA) to break off the US-sponsored talks with the Tel Aviv regime that had been resumed after a lengthy stalemate.

Acting PA Chief Mahmoud Abbas said on Sunday that new talks with the Israeli regime would not be resumed unless there is a complete halt in settlement expansion activities.

However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ruled out a freeze on the illegal process on Monday, saying there was “no need for another moratorium on settlement construction.”

HSN/PKH/HGH


http://www.presstv.ir/detail/201506.html

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Israeli occupation to raze kindergarten in Jerusalem



Israeli occupation to raze kindergarten in Jerusalem
18-09-2011,10:10
Al Qassam website- occupied Jerusalem- IOF troops accompanied by staff from Israel’s Civil Administration raided Friday Tuyour al-Jannah kindergarten at the Bedouin complex of the Anata village  in the Jerusalem district, and gave the residents of the complex a notice that the kindergarten will be demolished within a week.
The officials took photos of the kindergarten and six houses around it on the pretext that there was no planning permission for the building.
The kindergarten was established in 2009 in a Bedouin community in ‘Anata village northwest of Jerusalem city and serves 45 children.
The director of the Jerusalem Bedouins Society, Muhammad Kreishan, said: “The soldiers and Civil Administration staff came by foot, they raided the kindergarten, photographed it and the homes around it, then they handed the Bedouin community a demolition order for the kindergarten within a week,"
He added that the community was asked to demolish the kindergarten themselves within a week or it will be demolished by the occupation authorities and the community will have to pay the cost of its demolition.
Separately, in a report, Israeli rights group Peace Now said the IOA expropriated an area of more than 100 hectares in the northern West Bank for the interests of two unchartered Jewish settlements.
The decision to confiscate the land was in response to a petition by Peace Now to dismantle the two settlements Haresha and Hayovel in order to render the settlements legal with the courts.
Elsewhere, a Palestinian man sustained a gunshot wound in a settler attack on flashpoint Palestinian village Qusra to the south of Nablus.
Locals in the village, which recently suffered a mosque attack, managed to capture the settlers who infiltrated there. After they were released, the settlers fired randomly at homes drawing response from locals, said Ghassan Dughlas, an official in charge of settlement activity in the West Bank.
Later, some 15 Israeli military vehicles advanced towards the village. Witnesses said that locals also clashed with them.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

How US "charities" break tax laws to fund Israeli settlements

3 September 2011
 
In spite of US government statements about its displeasure with the expansion of Israeli settlements, US based organizations are abusing the 501(C)3 section of US tax codes to provide billions in subsidies to do exactly that.

There are hundreds of these tax-exempt, so-called charities funneling money to illegal Israeli settlements, often with the names no more creative than “American Friends of name an Israeli settlement.”

One such organization, American Friends of Ariel Inc., paints a picture of how these US based front groups collect tax-deductible donations, and use them to build and expand illegal Israeli settlements, and in some cases, purchase weapons for the settlers within them. In many cases, including that of American Friends of Ariel Inc., the organization does not make substantial efforts to disguise the fact that the US based tax exempt entity is nothing more than a shell organization being used to transfer money abroad.

For example, the president of American Friends of Ariel, Ron Nachman, also happens to be the longtime mayor of Ariel. The sole programmatic function of American Friends of Ariel is to transfer funds to a non-exempt organization based in Ariel called the Ariel Development Fund, also controlled by Nachman, which describes itself simply as the “fundraising arm of the city of Ariel.” Under Ron Nachman’s leadership, American Friends of Ariel transferred more than $5 million to the Ariel Development Fund over the last several years.

It is worth noting that much of the funding for American Friends of Ariel has come from Christian Zionist groups, and in general, these groups have played an increasingly dominant role in the financial and political support for the illegal Israeli settlement enterprise.

Devastating impact

The work of American Friends of Ariel Inc., and the many tax-exempt organizations like it, is having a devastating impact on local Palestinian communities. A recent report by the UN Office of Humanitarian Affairs, covered by the Ma’an News Agency, described the “alarming trends of forced displacement of Palestinians in Area C” as a result of settlement expansion, and found that “more demolitions have taken place so far in 2011 than in all of 2009 and 2010 combined” (“UN: Marked increase in forced displacement of Palestinians,” 21 July 2011).

In addition to the gross human rights violations inherent in illegal Israeli settlement expansion, US taxpayers simply cannot afford to build homes and walls in illegal Israeli settlements while record numbers of Americans are losing their homes, and unmet domestic needs in the US are at an all time high.

American Friends of Ariel, and the vast number of organizations like it, not only violate Palestinian human rights, they violate US laws. American Friends of Ariel Inc. flouts US laws in two ways.
The first has to do with the structure of the organization, and the fact that most of these tax exempt 501(c)3 organizations are simply shells that transfer money to non-exempt organizations abroad, and the second deals with the exempt purposes set forth by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Treasury Department.

The rule concerning the use of tax exempt entities as conduit organizations is clear, and states that “the code would be nullified if contributions inevitably committed to a foreign organization were held to be deductible solely because, in the course of transmittal to a foreign organization, they came to rest momentarily in a qualifying domestic organization” (Section 170(c)(2)(A)). That is exactly the case with American Friends of Ariel Inc., and hundreds of organizations like it, a fact which is abundantly clear upon review of their publicly available 990 tax forms.

Exacerbating poverty and neighborhood tensions

The second major legal violation occurs because these organizations fundamentally violate the purpose for which charities can be organized, namely to provide “relief of the poor, the distressed, or the underprivileged; lessening neighborhood tensions; eliminating prejudice and discrimination; defending human and civil rights secured by law; and combating community deterioration and juvenile delinquency.”

Illegal Israeli settlements, mostly built on expropriated land and operated with stolen resources, exacerbate poverty and systematically create an underprivileged class of people. Race-based colonies inherently increase neighborhood tensions, and they effectively annex occupied Palestinian land through a system of apartheid infrastructure that has been detrimental to Palestinian communities across the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem.

The raison d’etre of illegal Israeli settlements is rooted in institutionalized discrimination, and therefore technically violates IRS regulations on a daily basis in the same way that Bob Jones University violated those same regulations barring discrimination (Bob Jones University v United States).

In 1983, the Supreme Court ruled that the IRS had the authority to revoke the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University because they openly discriminated against interracially married individuals. The court ruled that such behavior was “wholly incompatible with the concepts underlying tax exemption,” and clarified by stating that “whatever may be the rationale for such private schools’ policies, racial discrimination in education is contrary to public policy.” Fundamental human rights like equality are not confined by jurisdiction, and organizations operating abroad are similarly bound to respect and uphold them.

The numerous and flagrant violations of the tax-exempt purposes set forth by the IRS and Treasury department should be reason enough to revoke the tax-exempt status of these organizations. It is hard to imagine the US playing any constructive role as an “honest broker” when in addition to providing $3 billion in annual military aid to Israel, Americans are also being forced to subsidize the construction and expansion of the same illegal settlements that our government is politely telling Israel are very unhelpful.

Because of the US government’s unwillingness to equally enforce the law, or use the proverbial stick instead of just carrots, money that would otherwise be going into our national treasury to pay down the debt or build affordable housing in the US, is instead being used to construct and defend Jewish-only colonies in the occupied West Bank.

Mike Coogan is a member of Virginians for Middle East Peace.

http://electronicintifada.net/content/how-us-charities-break-tax-laws-fund-israeli-settlements/10342